Peter Obi clarifies stance on fuel subsidy removal

Peter Obi, the presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP) has clarified his stance on the removal of fuel subsidy.

After President Bola Tinubu announced last week that the subsidy payment regime is gone, a declaration that hiked fuel price to over 200 per cent, the president supporters, in defence of their principal’s action, went on social media with the comments of the former Anambra governor who had earlier pledged to take similar action if elected president.

Clarifying his position on Tuesday after the court session at the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) in Abuja, the opposition candidate who seeks to unseat the president reaffirmed his support for the removal of fuel subsidy.

Speaking to judicial correspondents, he explained that he would not have immediately scrapped the subsidy payment without putting measures in place to cushion the economic effect it will have on the masses.

Read his clarification posted on Twitter Tuesday evening below:

As I attended my ongoing petition case at the Court of Appeal today, Tuesday, June 6, 2023, judicial correspondents ambushed me at the entrance of the court and demanded that I should talk to them.

When I told them I don’t speak on the matter before the court, they insisted that I should comment on the subsidy removal, which the government representatives were touting that I am in support of.

Reacting, I told them that I’ve actually been in support of the removal of subsidies right from the President Goodluck Jonathan era, when I was a member of the Economic Management team.

If you have followed me very well right from the time I was a member of Jonathan’s economic management team, I consistently maintained that subsidy should be removed because I see it as organized crime.

People were just stealing the resources of the country and I showed it empirically in my statistical analysis that we were not consuming the amount of fuel they claimed we consumed.

I also gave them the “tooth pain” removal analogy that if you approach a dentist to remove a painful tooth, he will apply a local anesthetic to numb the area around the tooth so you do not feel pain. It’s not the same thing as pulling the tooth forcefully, the pain you feel will be different. For me, I will go with the approach of the dentist, while supporting the removal of the tooth because I wouldn’t want to go through the pain of a forceful removal.

Recall that even when Jonathan’s government wanted to remove it they came up with various relieving policies like Sure-P and others.

If you read my manifesto you will see clearly how I planned to remove subsidies. I will govern with the people and show them statistically and empirically what we are going to save, and what we are going to do using the savings to better the suffering masses.

The problem in Nigeria is that often government tell the masses to suffer and sacrifice, for a better future; but in future things gets worse. -PO